On 19/08/09 at 16:41 -0000, gleeo wrote: > No, I don't see why you would do that. The best solution would be to > build with "./configure --program-suffix=*extension you tend to build > with with, for example, 1.9.1*" This is the best solution, let ruby do > the work for you, rather then bypass what ruby has setup for you and try > to hack on it yourself. And ./configure knows how rbconfig.rb should > look better then either of us i would presume :-)
I don't remember exactly what was the problem with using --program-suffix, but I remember it was doing something strange, and the end result was not what we wanted. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- ruby 1.9.1 should be configured with --program-suffix=1.9.1 if installed as ruby1.9.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413815 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs