Again, some clearer arguments: On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Reinhard Tartler<siret...@tauware.de> wrote: >> Thomas wants it to be removed, and I agree here for Karmic.
He's not using it there at all, and never will, and so cannot take the point of view of a user. For people actually using it, fai-client works pretty well, and the things announced here make things more complex for all people who only want to manage configurations, doing their installs another way (e.g. from a debian install server, with D-I, with dirinstall). > We could, >> however, try to push some packages to FAIs uni-koeln.de archive some >> packages for ubuntu, marked as very,very experimental. That's many steps to do in addition for people described above! Why not do something so someboidy installing the fai-server package is warned that it will most probably not work? Why not disable the building of the fai-server package in the build scripts? Henning -- Please remove fai source package and all resulting binary packages from karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419099 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
