> If you're not going to compare the readahead package *as it is shipped > with Ubuntu* against the sreadahead package *as it is shipped with > Ubuntu*, you're not helping.
I'm sorry, but that's not what you've asked for in #8. :-) Using the 'boot' and 'desktop' file shipped with readahead I indeed get equal times for readahead, sreadahead and sreadahead --no-fork (usable desktop after ~24s on the Core Duo system with a 7200rpm disk). Please note that I didn't want to make sreadahead look bad, I just couldn't confirm your observation. Thanks for clearing things up! -- Improve so it works on HDD disks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338822 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
