StefanPotyra <stefan.pot...@informatik.uni-erlangen.de> writes: > (subscribing siretart as another source for information). > > Just to make it clear, I'm not opposing to get a newer emacs in in > general (even though I'm a vi user :P). What's the state of emacs- > snapshot right now? Is emacs23 newer? Should we drop emacs-snapshot (and > rdepends) in favour of emacs23 or should we go the other way round and > update emacs-snapshot to emacs23? Or does it make sense to have 3 > versions around for karmic?
emacs-snapshot remains to track the HEAD branch and is updated every 2-3 weeks in Romains repository. He updates it in his private debian repo, and also uploads to the ubuntu-elisp PPA. We can argue that we should provide emacs-snapshot only from the ~elisp PPA, though. As for the released versions of emacs, I really think we should go with emacs22 and emacs23. Having emacs-snapshot wouldn't hurt IMO. We do the same with gcc-snapshot after all. -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- FFe for emacs23 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
