Sorry for bumping this bug, but i files a similar bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/435290
Reading the last statement that there has to be a local disk present for the iSCSI package to become loaded; is this intentional or is this a bug? It surely isn't consistent with the goals of something using iSCSI; to have a diskless ubuntu client. So why then is it a requirement to have a local disk present? Why doesn't Ubuntu display a friendly message when no local disks are found, with a few options such as activating support for iSCSI to install to the network instead; without any local disk present. This is how iSCSI should be used, when installing Ubuntu to, IMO. -- iSCSI install fails under hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236640 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
