when will the native 64-bit flash plugin be installed by default? I've been using it with no problems for over a year with intel integrated graphics.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Ken Hagan <[email protected]> wrote: > I posted bug 238394, currently marked as one of 6 duplicates of this > bug, but I have to say that (for me) the problem disappeared when I > upgraded from 7.10 to 8.04, which isn't the experience here. I say > "upgrade", I think I did upgrade originally, but I have since had to > restore my system to a new hard disk, which I did by installing a clean > 8.04 and restoring large parts of the file-system from backup, so I'm > probably not a good reference point. Nevertheless, I'm not convinced > these seven reports are all true duplicates. > > Whilst I'm here, those affected by this bug might want to try Flash 10. > It's available as a clean 64-bit plug-in and presumably has fewer hoops > (bugs?) to jump through to actually put pixels on the screen. (It > certainly gives me no problems.) > > Also, since the unavoidability of Flash comes largely from its use in > adverts, there's the option of blocking flash in most pages and only > enabling it for sites where you actually wanted to watch the video. > Won't help with YouTube, but certainly would for the average site, where > flash videos are *only* used in annoying adverts! > > -- > nspluginviewer comsumes allmoust all CPU > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/240930 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of a duplicate bug. > -- nspluginviewer comsumes allmoust all CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/240930 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
