On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 19:38 +0000, Jan Včelák wrote: > Scott, I went trough reported bugs before reporting this one and I think > this is another problem. But maybe I'm wrong. > I entirely agree, the missing /proc/filesystems issue is entirely separate from any SEGV issue.
> As for the initramfs: No, you aren't right. I have self compiled kernel > (2.6.31.1) and don't use initramfs. The only change I made was > downgrading the mountall package from 0.2.1 to 0.1.8. > This was what I was confirming - I suspected you did not have an initramfs. > Are you sure it has nothing to do with Robert's SEGV? It seems similar > to me. > Yes, very sure. The /proc/filesystems issue is simply that the code in mountall to mount /proc is in the wrong place ;-) Scott -- Scott James Remnant [email protected] ** Also affects: mountall (Ubuntu Karmic) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu Karmic) Milestone: None => ubuntu-9.10 ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu Karmic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Scott James Remnant (scott) -- mountall: /proc/filesystems: No such file or directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447947 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
