Now getfem++ is in debian archive: http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/getfem++.html
so it can be merged from there in the next release cycle. WARNING: ------------------- The source package includes the libgmm++-dev binary pckage which should now replace the standalone version of libgmm found here: http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/libgmm-dev hmmm, now I see there is also: http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/libgmm++-dev which is practically the same package. (I suppose the second one has been merged from Debian while the first one has been updated from jaunty. Apparently due to the slight different name it hasn't be detected as an existing package to be replaced) Should I report a separate bug for this or just wait for both to be removed when getfem++ comes in the archive? -- [needs-packaging] getfem++ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413165 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
