On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 07:37:38PM -0000, Zer0 wrote: > //host/share did the trick. Is this still a bug or should be reported > the way it should be from now on?
It's still a bug; mountall shouldn't mangle any fstab lines that worked with pre-mountall scripts. > Im asking this since on forums there are lot of threads about doing it > like this \\host\share > Thanks for helping resolving this issue. I personally think is better to > do it the unix way //host/share anyway Yes, it definitely is better; using the non-unix syntax is always going to be a ready source of new bugs in its handling. We should be committed to fixing those bugs when we find them, but users should spare themselves the trouble of dealing with those bugs in the first place by using //host/share. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected] -- cifs share not mounting on boot when using \\host\share syntax in fstab https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/451432 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
