On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 19:30 +0000, Cristian Aravena Romero wrote:
> Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. Unfortunately we can't
> fix it, because your description didn't include enough information.

This seems very bureaucratic (which is a shame -- rules just for rules'
sake is a silly waste of everybody's time) as it does not really seem to
bear relevance to the original request.  However, I will play along...

> Please include the following additional information, if you have not already 
> done so (please pay attention to lspci's additional options), as required by 
> the Ubuntu Kernel Team:
> 1. Please include the output of the command "uname -a" in your next response. 
> It should be one, long line of text which includes the exact kernel version 
> you're running, as well as the CPU architecture.

Linux pc 2.6.20-6-generic #2 SMP Wed Jan 31 20:53:39 UTC 2007 i686
GNU/Linux

> 2. Please run the command "dmesg > dmesg.log" and attach the resulting
file "dmesg.log" to this bug report.

Done.

> 3. Please run the command "lspci -vvnn > lspci-vvnn.log" and attach
the resulting file "lspci-vvnn.log" to this bug report.

Done.

b.

-- 
My other computer is your Microsoft Windows server.

Brian J. Murrell

-- 
small patch for g400 capture devices
https://launchpad.net/bugs/80608

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to