I can confirm that this is a 32/64 bit problem. On 32-bit karmic 9.10 (using Numeric 24.2, python 2.6.4), I get the expected behavior: >>> Numeric.arange(0,3)[1:] array([1, 2]) >>> Numeric.arange(0,3)[1::] array([1, 2])
Using the same versions on 64-bit karmic/9.10, I get the following: >> Numeric.arange(0,3)[1:] #This gives the wrong answer zeros((0,), 'l') >>> Numeric.arange(0,3)[1::] #This seems to work array([1, 2]) -- Some slices of Numeric.array are wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263781 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
