It seems that #557865 is resolved in our package, thanks. Packaging looks mostly okay.
The diff.gz has tons and tons of patches (most of them backported apparently). Aren't there enough upstream releases of autofs5? Related to that, is 5 still considered "experimental"? Those kinds of branches often get intrusive and incompatible changes during their development, which might cause troubles for LTS users which later upgrade to a later version of the 5 branch? What was the rationale to switch to an experimental branch in an LTS? -- MIR for autofs5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
