On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:53:50 -0000, "Cody A.W. Somerville" <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm fine with this SRU going through as the patch is clearly benign and > I can certainly imagine how annoying it is. However, I think we should > re-evaluate point 4 as it leaves the door wide open for all sorts of > changes. These sort of SRU adds load to both the SRU and QA team which > could probably be better invested on testing and reviewing changes to > fix regressions and more serious bugs. > > In fact, with this specific SRU, we're not even fixing a bug but > updating it to add support for a newer target distribution - something > that will need to happen again in the future. I question if SRUs should > be used to performed regularly required updates.
I don't intend for this to happen again. I forgot that the list was hardcoded, and so didn't add it when the new name was announced, I aim to do that this time. I think the discussion is worthwhile to have though, just maybe not on this bug report :-) Thanks, James -- mark-uploaded fails with "Unknown target distribution: lucid" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476530 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
