> Note that old machines of the sort that are susceptible to this
> problem are particularly likely to have disks small enough that
> carving them up into more pieces is liable to create a usability
> problem later.

It seems that in cases of older systems then you have to choose between two 
problems:
1. Splitting the disk space up may cause future problems due to a lack of total 
disk space.
2. Failing to split the disk space up will prevent the system from working at 
all.

It seems to me that (1) is the lesser of the two evils, and any system
modern enough to not suffer from the cyl>1024 problem will also have a
hard drive big enough to deal with losing ~100MB of space to a /boot
partition.

I'm certainly happy to see a warning that explains what I have to do to
fix the problem if an automatic solution is considered too complex.
However, the current state of affairs is bad - I upgraded the machine
from (fully working) Fedora Core to Ubuntu Edgy and it just plain didn't
boot - no warnings that there might be problems or anything.  Not a good
user experience.

I'm a seasoned Linux developer, so it was pretty easy for me to spot the
problem, but a normal user would just conclude that Ubuntu is "broken"
since another distro has been shown to work on the same hardware
flawlessly.

-- 
/boot is on root partition by default
https://launchpad.net/bugs/88633

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to