On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 15:18 +0000, BigBaaadBob wrote: > Scott: I don't understand the logic. Ureadahead is NOT operating > properly (which is evident from all the reports here) but because it > isn't the one printing the message this bug is invalid? > There is only one report here, from Ernst filed on 2009-11-18 in which the computer booted normally and ureadahead worked, other than a message on the console from Upstart.
The fact that other users, including yourself, have bundled in with different problems is irrelevant. This bug is just about a harmless message when you have other filesystems listed in your /etc/fstab > Ureadahead NEVER works on my system which has, as I noted above, three > mounts: /, /boot, and /home. It never works on lots of other systems as > reported above. > > There needs to be a bug report that tracks the problem of Ureadahead not > working on all these systems, nomatter what software is reporting the > problem. Or it needs to be removed from Ubuntu. > I don't disagree. If ureadahead is not working, then you need to file a bug. A new bug. Then we'll debug and diagnose it there. Scott -- Scott James Remnant sc...@ubuntu.com -- init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
