The reason I tended to favor moving to an Index file were to allow multiple hash formats in the same file (SHA1: ..., Md5sums: ...) because clearly md5 alone wasn't good enough.
I'm fine with having SHA1SUMS + MD5SUMS etc., that solves the same problem, albeit I wonder whether we could benefit from increased consistency by using Index and Release files instead of having a distinct layout for installer images. I think having self contained directories is important too, but I believe they need to match the archive anyway? Thanks for your feedback! -- debian-installer images aren't signed in the archive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431790 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
