That patch isn't right, needs to seteuid() around the read() call, but
the module doesn't know what the uid is going to be; wondering whether
hard-coding some number in there will upset pitti

-- 
rsyslogd spins CPU on some kernels
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523610
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to