> At this point we need to focus on minimizing the amount of code added to any > upload (for easier verification), so if the additions from comment #30 > suffice by themselves, it makes more sense to use them.
My reason for preferring tweaking the udev/pulseaudio configuration over tweaking ALSA's is that for professional audio apps (JACK, Ardour, Hydrogen, etc) pulseaudio is irrelevant, and ALSA's default configuration works exactly as it should. In particular, I'm worried about the effects that "slave.format S32_LE" might have on ALSA's full support of the card. Could someone confirm whether the solution from comment #30 has no adverse effects on ALSA/JACK applications? And on the ability to configure the card via the envy24control ALSA tool? -- Pulseaudio fails to initialize ICE1712 chipsets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/178442 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
