I'm more-or-less back online, I will probably start redesigning the packages in a month or so. I must admit that I don't use this package and I simply did it out of packaging interest. :)
But I would like someone to answer the following: 1. What purpose cinepaint serves that makes it unique? 2. Are you 100% sure that cinepaint is the only tool available for what makes it unique? I'm asking because I have noticed several HDR imaging tools, like: http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/qtpfsgui Also noticed Krita for KDE: http://krita.org/features Mantas Kriaučiūnas: > It seems you don't need to maintain libelektra packages -Christophe > Mehay already packaged libelektra, see https://launchpad.net/~goldy- > goldenfish/+archive/ppa , please use these packages instead repackaging > libelekra by yourself. I suppose I could merge the package names in debian/control with my package, since I've done more "work" to install files in the right directories, defined the copyright and removed the unnecessary (not sure if they are unnecessary) *_static files. Milan Knizek: > Thanks for the PPA. Note that oyranos-icc conflicts with "icc-profiles" > package. Milan, should I not create the package oyranos-icc? Are all icc profiles included in icc-profiles ? -- Please re-add cinepaint to Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190791 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
