I object to fixing this in the client library. If this is a bug in the
service, it should be fixed in the service. So what happens when it is
fixed in Eucalyptus? It is removed from boto? You could argue that it
doesn't have to be, since boto would continue to work regardless of
whether an int or a string is returned by the service, but it is best to
fix problems where they arise and not introduce needless client
workarounds. Potentially, this approach leads to a number of hacks on
the client end that are unnecessary, will work with only a single client
and potentially reduces code quality.

-- 
euca-describe-snapshots invalid literal for int() with base 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520707
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to