Pete is right, sorry, I didn't know about the vanilla kernel being available. And another_sam, what I meant was not the kernel compilation options (default or not), but the patch set each distribution uses to get the kernel the way they like it (or consider more robust, faster, more [something]...).
However, I don't agree with Pete when he insists on not using any other kernel apart from ppa. I think everyone here is well clear on why I proposed the test, so another_sam will not complain to ubuntu-devs that his new spanking kernel has wireless 100% but something else won't work, "so have it fixed for those new bugs". Don't worry about that. A test is only a test. If the ppa kernel is indeed vanilla with all the options the ubuntu team normally sets, then that's the best bet for the test. If, however, by any chance the ppa kernel shows the same bug, then another_sam should really try the vanilla kernel from kernel.org, just to be sure. This is a simple testing procedure that everyone does nowadays, since it's the less time-consuming approach available. -- [Jaunty] Intel wireless 3945ABG is unstable and disconnects frequently https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348204 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
