On 04/01/2010 10:00 AM, Mike Arthur wrote: > The security and/or alpha status decision are political reasons. A > pragmatist would say that the x86_64 actually provides a better user > experience and makes Ubuntu look better and could be pulled (if > necessary) if there is a major security problem. > Pulling is not looked on as a favorable option. > Simply put, the nspluginwrapper solution does not work nearly well > enough. Flash is important for many users to use the web. It's simply > not good enough that this issue has been raised for over a year without > any resolution. > > Most users won't even look at the wiki, they will just install Flash > using Synaptic, it'll crash their browser, they'll say "Ubuntu sucks" > and move on. Saying this information shouldn't even be on the wiki is > beyond ridiculous. > > nspluginwrapper is a buggy hack. I'm not sure why it's seen to be of > higher quality than an alpha release made by the actual creators of > Flash. > > I have no trouble with 32 bit Flash on a 64 bit system. In fact, since Karmic, it's been very stable.
-- Please package flashplugin 64bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
