To refuse change because "it's different" is BAD. To change only because "it's different" is BAD.
Anyway, good decision comes from good rationale (except maybe in casinos). Where's the rationale here ? None is explained. Where's the benefit here ? None is explained. What's the risk ? The risk is to force a change in user's habits without visible reasons. He should not appreciate even if he'll get use to with time. Even if it's far from being a big deal it really looks like a bad decision. I love Ubuntu and its community and thank all the teams (devs, designers, managers ...) providing to the community this wonderful desktop. So after all, the design team may really have a killer idea to use that vacuum on the right. Time will say, but waiting for explanation/rationale on that subject it will be (for me) nothing more than a bad decision. -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
