Thanks for checking up.  The problem disappeared when I upgraded to
9.10  I assume it was the new kernel version that did it.  So we didn't
learn anything, but at least you get to close the bug report.  Thanks
again for your dedication.

On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 23:53 +0000, Jeremy Foshee wrote:
> Hi Graeme,
> 
> This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it 
> recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try with the 
> latest development release of Ubuntu?  ISO CD images are available from 
> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/ .
>         
> If it remains an issue, could you run the following command from a Terminal 
> (Applications->Accessories->Terminal).  It will automatically gather and 
> attach updated debug information to this report.
>         
> apport-collect -p linux 444152
>         
> Also, if you could test the latest upstream kernel available that would be 
> great.  It will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue.  
> Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds .  Once you've tested 
> the upstream kernel, please remove the 'needs-upstream-testing' tag.  This 
> can be done by clicking on the yellow pencil icon next to the tag located at 
> the bottom of the bug description and deleting the 'needs-upstream-testing' 
> text.  Please let us know your results.
>         
> Thanks in advance.
>         
>     [This is an automated message.  Apologies if it has reached you 
> inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]
>     
> 
> ** Tags added: needs-kernel-logs
> 
> ** Tags added: needs-upstream-testing
> 
> ** Tags added: kj-triage
> 
> ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
>        Status: New => Incomplete
>

-- 
Hard lockup using firefox (but not exclusively) in 9.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444152
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to