So you are saying it is better for me to not build a deb file of the most recent stable Maxima ( or any package for that matter) which has been out for 3 months now and is not in Debian and which I am pretty sure I can at least for my computer i386 using the appropriate methods. But it is better to for me to download the source of an older version, build it and use it? Where is the logic? I am sure there is some but I don't get it. It is not like I won't be interested in giving my package back to the Debian maintainer of Maxima.
My question is why should I have to wait for a Debian maintainer who might be very busy? Instead I can build the new package and give it to him? -- Why not use 5.11 https://launchpad.net/bugs/92715 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
