On 4/20/2010 6:31 AM, Jean-Baptiste Lallement wrote: > auto_da_alloc doesn't even detect the replace via rename situation > (in fact it does, but only in the simplest cases)
Ahh, so it *IS* broken, even with data=ordered. > It's not the place to discuss about it since this report is about > performance, but I don't think the solution is to add fsyncs to all > the applications around and it is not realistic. The solution is to > fix ext4 itself. To draw a parallel, there is no single database > engine leaving empty rows when a transaction failed. Why should a fs > behave differently ? Yes, ext4 should be fixed then. A rename() replacing an existing file must act as a barrier causing the new file to be flushed before the rename is committed. -- My computer updates are very slow since latest dpkg update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537241 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
