> I also agree with Philip's assessment. When it hits, it is > devastating, but it takes a very specific series of events to hit, > and asking people to not upgrade as a result is too extreme.
I agree: Re-attaching parts of an array that have been running degraded separately and contain the same amount and conflicting changes, results in the assembly of a corrupt array. > Philip, you mentioned to me that 9.10 was also affected-- what about > earlier releases? It was probably present in the current form since the udev rules use "mdadm --incremental". (9.04 if I remember correctly) -- array with conflicting changes is assembled with data corruption/silent loss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
