@Steve,

Ah!  I see, there is currently no attempt to "support" any case where
one's kernel comes from "outside" the Ubuntu installation being
upgraded.

As Dmitry mentions (and as indicated by the general discussion here), I
think there are a lot of people who are using Ubuntu one way or another
where that does happen. I wonder if there is any chance the Ubuntu
project could come up with some "policy" regarding support for those
situations (for Maverick, obviously).

 (I would be happy to open new bug for that issue if you thought there
would be any interest in pursuing the idea further, especially if you
could give me a hint as to what "package" such a bug should be be filed
against.)


Anyway, on the topic of the Lucid release notes, I certainly understand the 
desire to keep them as short as possible.  On the other hand, it really seems 
that even a user "advanced" enough to be running e.g. a Xen server would prefer 
to have *some* warning before initiating an upgrade to Lucid that is doomed to 
abort mid-upgrade this way (leaving dpkg/apt/aptitude in a "broken" 
configuration)....

Perhaps a compromise would be to add a one-line paragraph saying
something like "Users who would like to run Lucid using a kernel older
than 2.6.24 should see <ThisPage>", pointing to a page somewhere under
help.ubuntu.com or wiki.ubuntu.com.  [Using "2.6.24" because that was
the version in Hardy.]

I would be willing to create the initial version of such a page,
provided that you were interested in linking to it (and especially if
someone what was more familiar than I am with the existing wiki/help
pages could recommend a good location for creating it).

-- 
tar/gnulib bug prevents bootstraping Lucid on Dapper, causes Lucid upgrade to 
abort on older linux kernels (e.g. in a chroot or Xen VM)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539814
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to