On 04/28/2010 09:55 AM, Micah Gersten wrote: > I think this is the case with any metapackage. If you want, file another > bug against Seamonkey and I'll try to find the appropriate place/dupe > for the bug. Thanks for testing! ...
I'll try to get to that tomorrow. However, you're now aware of the problem, and no, the issue is not the same for other metapackages; you install via a metapackage, you should be able to uninstall via the same metapackage. The installation/uninstallation issue should be fixed regardless of whether a separate bug is filed or not. Wishlist (yes I can file a new wishlist issue on this tomorrow if necessary): Can the packages now _please_ be built for Hardy & Karmic? Neither will install with the lucid packages due to dependency issues. Hardy is a supported LTS that will be around for some time. Karmic will also be around for some time before folks make transitions to 10.04. Continuing to run on 1.1.17 is a security issue. Of course you'll need to contend with complaints regarding the form filling issues in the transition from 1.x to 2.x, but that will happen in lucid as well. I'd vote for updated security vs old form filling methods anyday. -- [FFe] Update Seamonkey to 2.0.x https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
