> It is not possible to backport the changes to 9.10 because they are very large and invasive, and touch a wide spread of the code boot of the system.
Thats ridiculous. Didn't you already implement 99% of the changes needed with the "bootwait" option? Just make this default and you are done. > I removed the security vulnerability flag because there is no demonstrated security issue here; you do not need the security team subscribed to the bug and that's all that flag does. In any case, it actually makes it much *LESS* likely your bug will be fixed since it limits the people who can see the bug. Thats not true. I specifically set the "make this public" flag, so everybody should be able to see this. And security doesn't work by only fixing things that are "demonstrated security issue" but by fixing everything that might be security related. Otherwise you'll never get things secure. I think the security people should have a chance to look at this! -- mountall endangers system stability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571116 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
