On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:06 PM, NoOp wrote: > So should I file a separate report for Subsystem Id: 0x103c360b?
Yes. > So why the huge difference between the two? Note: in karmic internal mic The only version string that matters for the driver is in /proc/asound/version. The installed package version of alsa-base and linux-sound-base have no bearing whatsoever: they're only scripts. > And where should I look? Is alsa-base not the correct module affecting > this? See above. > No. It took me quite some time the othere day to back out the -dev mess > and restore my systems (karmic and lucid) back to standard after your > previous suggestions. I had to 'force versions' to back out the -dev > packages. No *user* should be advised to use ppa:ubuntu-audio-dev. Eh? Which packages were involved? -- 0x1179ffe0 needs olpc-xo-1_5 model quirk for hp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573284 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
