Ok, that is an interesting link and I had a few eye-opening moments (I read almost all of the original chat log). However, I disagree with many of the assessments on that page. Regardless, it may be very difficult to do what SRWare has done, and chromium still has all of the problems that created the need for Iron. For whatever reason people haven't "fixed" chromium. Oh and you were right about rapidshare, it's a pain in the ass!
Though your suggestions sound fine with me, I guess. Is there any way we can see some of these changes put into chromium? I'm new to ubuntu policies so I don't know how one would go about getting this done. I have attached a *partial* list of differences between Chromium and Iron to this ticket. You can read the patch directly (preferred) or apply the patch to a checkout: svn export http://src.chromium.org/svn/trunk/@37090 cd trunk patch -p1 <../patch-iron-partial-37090 I haven't tried to compile or test anything, this is just what I have found from downloading the rapidshare files. adrian ** Attachment added: "patch-iron-partial-37090" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48772874/patch-iron-partial-37090 -- [needs-packaging] iron https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483473 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
