Is $XDG_DATA_HOME/../lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins really the right spot? The "../" seems a little fragile, and the result definitely seems a step backwards for usability. It will make it much harder to install and manage plugins by hand simply by virtue of being a much deeper and harder to find directory, which would be an unfortunate regression.
Would it acceptable to at least leave a symlink in $XDG_CONFIG_DIRS/bazaar/plugins? Or perhaps there's another option? -- Bazaar does not follow the Freedesktop XDG Base Directory Specification https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195397 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
