On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 12:47:49AM -0000, Johan Walles wrote:
> If the non informative stack trace was because of foreign libs, at least
> the name of the foreign lib should be seen in the stack trace.

I think the retrace will not see the foreign lib if it is not
available.

> 
> Now we have lines like...
> #0  0xb7785e09 in vfprintf () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> 
> ... which is obviously inside of libc, but takes no parameters according
> to the unwinder.  Comparing that to the vfprintf() man page shows that
> this is wrong.

this might be a different issue, e.g. not properly installed libc
debug symbols, however the rest of the stack is still worthless.

However, I wonder why we have not libvlc.so debug symbols.

Anyway, all this discussion is fruitless, as we still have no usable
stacktrace.

Either producing a stacktrace directly on your system might help, or
even better getting a testcase to reproduce.
 

 - Alexander

-- 
Firefox crash
https://launchpad.net/bugs/94753

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to