On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:59:22AM -0000, Alkis Georgopoulos wrote: > Btw speaking about LTSP differences, the nbd initramfs script uses > commas to separate the host from the port (nbdroot=*,*,*), while the > ltsp_nbd initramfs script uses colons (nbdroot=*:*) - wouldn't it be > better if the same conventions were used in both cases?
Perhaps, yes. The reason I did commas rather than colons was so that supporting IPv6 would be easy while still using shell wildcards. Since NBD has acquired IPv6 support since 2.9.15, that wasn't unimportant. Having said that, I don't think it would hurt to support the ltsp_nbd syntax as an alternative, provided it does not break anything in my current scripts. I would need a pointer to how that works then, however. Regards, -- The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is trying to fool the system. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/01/biometrics.html -- feature request: add a root-path parameter https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593227 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
