Alright. I'm sorry. I realize that this is open source software and that the developers aren't paid for the software. Personally, I'll use it just as much if this isn't added as this piece of software is better then apt-cacher and not even worth mentioning in the same sentence as apt-proxy.
If I get a chance to download the source I'll see if i can understand it enough to write a patch myself. Still, I felt a bit offended by your word choice, Rolf. I realize we're not face to face, so you can say almost anything you want to me, but we _are_ both human beings. On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Rolf Leggewie <[email protected]> wrote: > I never questioned this may be something that you'd like to see. I'm > questioning whether it's meaningful that others (!) spend their time > developing and maintaining this just for you. You're of course free to > ask if Eduard as the main dev for apt-cacher-ng wants to take this on as > a project paid by you. > > -- > option on import to not replace current packages > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602593 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- option on import to not replace current packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602593 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
