*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 96099 *** This wasn't meant as a personal insult. If we end up w/ the same bug report twice, we choose the one w/ the most information, the first one we see, the one that already has duplicates, or we draw lots and consult a psychic. Marking bugs as duplicates is our way of controlling the work flow of bugs coming in, and not a way of passing judgment upon the reporters.
I'm sorry if it came across that way. On 3/26/07, rlpw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 96099 *** > > I do not make duplicates. If you read the time stamp my report came out four > hours before the other. > > On 3/26/07, Vijnana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 96099 *** > > > > ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 96099 > > linux-image-2.6.20-13 is available but > > linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20-13 is not available > > > > -- > > nvidia-glx incompatable with image 2.6.20-13.21 > > https://launchpad.net/bugs/96007 > > > > -- > nvidia-glx incompatable with image 2.6.20-13.21 > https://launchpad.net/bugs/96007 > -- Anybody who tells me I can't use a program because it's not open source, go suck on rms. I'm not interested. 99% of that I run tends to be open source, but that's _my_ choice, dammit. -- Linus Torvalds -- nvidia-glx incompatable with image 2.6.20-13.21 https://launchpad.net/bugs/96007 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
