I ... don't remember. But soon there will be 1.0 :) But you are right. Regards, Dan
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire < [email protected]> wrote: > Which revision was this fixed in please, so I can consider a temporary > patch? > > It would be really helpful to have similar information in other "fix > committed" or "fix released bugs" too in future :) > > -- > Should not backup ~/.gvfs > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534829 > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In > Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time. > > Status in Back In Time: Fix Committed > Status in “backintime” package in Ubuntu: New > > Bug description: > This should be on the exclude list automatically since this is for virtual > fs. I noticed my backup was taken a really long time it was backing up a > system that I connected to over sftp in nautilus > > ProblemType: Bug > Architecture: i386 > Date: Mon Mar 8 22:33:52 2010 > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 > InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091028.5) > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia > Package: backintime-gnome 0.9.26-3 > PackageArchitecture: all > ProcEnviron: > PATH=(custom, user) > LANG=en_US.utf8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.24-generic-pae > SourcePackage: backintime > Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic-pae i686 > > > -- Should not backup ~/.gvfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534829 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
