hmm daniel I ll apply the upstream patch and i ll open a new upstream request in debian
regards On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Daniel Holbach <[email protected]> wrote: > It was fixed in upstream like this: http://git.gnome.org/browse/sound- > juicer/commit/?id=0adaffaea1028f5ef90f6aff675b9c81fbfb6a54 and is part > of 2.31.6, maybe that should be packaged? > > -- > sound juicer ftbfs in maverick > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615439 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > > Status in “sound-juicer” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed > Status in “sound-juicer” package in Debian: Unknown > > Bug description: > Binary package hint: sound-juicer > > Buildlogs: > > http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu-nbs/32/sound-juicer_2.28.2-1_lubuntu32.buildlog > > http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu-nbs/64/sound-juicer_2.28.2-1_lubuntu64.buildlog > > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sound-juicer/+bug/615439/+subscribe > -- Bhavani Shankar.R https://launchpad.net/~bhavi, a proud ubuntu community member. What matters in life is application of mind!, It makes great sense to have some common sense..! -- sound juicer ftbfs in maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615439 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
