The ones I had checked seem to be mirrors of archive.canonical.com. I take it archive.ubuntu.com is supposed to be authoritative.
Should apt-file be somehow responsible for picking a fallback server if the one in /etc/apt/sources.list does not carry Contents-<arch>.gz, or should all mirrors be required to also mirror the Contents files? @ubuntu-mirror-admins: any opinion on this? See also bug #179899! (Should ubuntu-mirror-admins be subscribed to that one as well?) -- apt-file update complains about missing Contents-i386.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
