On 15.08.2010 22:25, Stefano Rivera wrote: >> I also don't understand why you assign to me and then set to > incomplete. > > Standard sponsor procedure. Unsubscribing sponsors doesn't show up in > e-mail, and I've never sponsored for you before.
I'm not sure I understand you correctly. FWIW, your explanation doesn't make sense to me. I think what you are saying is that you assigned to me to trigger a mail to the sponsors ml to document the status there. Please correct if that's incorrect. So far, so good. I still don't understand why you then set to incomplete. Only reasonable explanation I can find is that you are bugging the assigned dev (me in this case) which is a no-no and you should know that, having much larger powers than me. >> Please reopen the karmic task. > > Opened. Thanks. As far as the lucid and karmic SRU are concerned, you are right about the version number. I thought about the possible conflict, but could not remember the correct solution and eventually settled on "as long as it's not the same release pocket, it seems to be/must be OK". FWIW, the current system in Ubuntu is flawed. Instead of mixing SRU releases as 2.0-2.1, 2.0-2ubuntu0.5.04.1 and 2.0-2ubuntu0.5.10.1 we should just do what debian does in that case and ALWAYS upload SRU as 2.0-2karmic1 and 2.0-2lucid1 (IMVHO). Not sure where that suggestion would need to be raised. -- link to gnomescan homepage broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482618 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
