Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: filezilla

We currently have beta 2 is in archive, synced from Debian. The Debian 
maintainer doesn't update filezilla because they don't have wxwidgets2.8 yet, 
which is needed for beta >= 3.
beta 2 was an early stage of the development of filezilla 3 and upstream says 
"I consider beta 2 nonfunctional", "better remove it alltogether than to 
distribute beta 2".
beta 2 -> beta 7 changes are a *lot* of bug fixes and improvements. According 
to upstream, bug #96804 is fixed. Bug #88897 will be fixed too because 
filezilla will be built with wxgtk 2.8 (though, I could just upload a rebuild 
of beta 2 for wxgtk 2.8, but... better with beta 7).
I'm subscribed to filezilla bug mail and will take care of any problem that 
could appear with this release.

 filezilla (3.0.0~beta7-0ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream release
   * Merge from Debian unstable. Remaining change:
      - Set Maintainer to Ubuntu MOTU Developers
   * debian/control:
      - Build with wxgtk 2.8 (LP: #88897)
      - Build-Depends on libgnutls-dev
   * debian/rules: use --disable-autoupdatecheck
   * debian/patches/:
      - 00list: dropped all patches, they are included upstream
      - fix-for-gnutls.dpatch: fixes gnutls requirement (we have a too old
        version in the archive)
 .
 filezilla (3.0.0~beta2-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Patch to avoid filezilla crash when ~/.filezilla doesn't exist, thanks to
     Adrien Cunin.

** Affects: filezilla (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
     Assignee: MOTU UVF Team
         Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
[UVFe request] filezilla 3.0.0~beta7-0ubuntu1
https://launchpad.net/bugs/99406

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to