Dapper desktop has been EOLed over a year ago, and a new font isn't
interesting for servers, so WONTFIXing.
Similarly, Jaunty will go EOL in a few weeks, I don't think it is worth
the trouble there.
For the other releases, the usual vehicle for this is backports.
However, I agree that the regression potential is pretty close to zero,
so I have no technical arguments to put against this "SABDFL policy
exception" :-)
I'm waiting a bit for another SRU team member to comment; in particular
I'd be interested in an opinion from the less biased community members
like John.
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: ubuntu-font-family-sources (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
Ubuntu Font Family would be valuable for older releases
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/650889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
