On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 03:25:05 -0000, Fabrice Coutadeur wrote: > Hi,
Hello, > All required packages has been synced. Thank you! > Could you please check if the sync is still relevant, and if so, document the > FFe (basically, checking that package builds, installs and runs fine, > documenting the tests you've done)? Debian/unstable now has 0.0.svn3514-1. This is the additional changelog entry from the original report: josm (0.0.svn3514-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream snapshot * debian/patches/* refreshed to cleanly apply to the new code * debian/patches/60-port_oauth_1.2.patch removed, merged upstream * debian/control: - Build-Depends on default-jdk bumped to >= 1.6 - Standards-Version bumped to 3.9.1, no changes needed - drop alternative dependency on sun-java5-jre: Java 5 is no more supported by upstream -- David Paleino <da...@debian.org> Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:58:00 +0200 However, I couldn't succesfully build this version on maverick. The reason is a change I made in debian/control: - default-jdk, + default-jdk (>= 1:1.6), It fails on Maverick because it has default-jdk 1.6, while Debian has 1:1.6. I could fix this in a -2 (maybe using (>= 1:1.6) | (>= 1.6), or maybe some more solid hack using dpkg-vendor), and I also have another change [0] pending for -2 -- would it be acceptable to FFe this new version (which I should still upload to sid)? Otherwise, the original version this sync/FFe was for (3376-1), is still available in Debian/testing -- it should be possible to sync it from there. (I'd prefer the newer version though). What would you suggest? Thank you, David [0]: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-grass/josm.git;a=commitdiff;h=e3b751a10db983a9d05cf744bdba9e4368b97617 -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174 -- Sync josm 0.0.svn3376-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613926 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs