A, B and C seem to be about skipping further input files when 100% of
the data has been found, and are therefore equivalent to bug 605428,
which already has a patch, so they require no further consideration.
D seems to be about changing the order in which zsync searches for local
data. This is less obvious, and it's not clear to me whether the
proposed ordering would be better *in general* than what zsync does
today. It depends on how it is typically used, and I don't have any data
on that.
** Changed in: zsync (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: zsync (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Summary changed:
- zsync doesn't work optimaly with local files (and this can be improved)
+ Could finish faster in some cases if local files were scanned in a different
order
--
Could finish faster in some cases if local files were scanned in a different
order
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477434
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
