"Steve Langasek" <[email protected]> wrote: >it is a performance regression on some hardware, in exchange for >correcting a regression in basic functionality of the package on other >supported hardware. In the absence of other solutions, I think this is >preferable over the status quo. Do you disagree?
I believe the foundational assumption that there is a lack of alternative options is premature at best. The lack of runtime detection is a bug that upstream says is fixed in Qt 4.7.1. In general I think that prior to uploading an SRU, and in particular before uploading an SRU like this that guarantees regression for some users, it would be useful to have a conversation with the Ubuntu team that does most of the maintenance work on a package. -- QT on armel is built with NEON by default https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664431 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
