@Brandon, sorry for the late response. Have been traveling. And yes,
Scott's reply is right. The comment about 68G was made because selecting
this size seems to trigger the crash more reliably. But it has nothing
to do with the memory size itself. Just that requesting that size seems
to get you a recent Intel box behind the covers. Just found this to
happen while looking at another bug about 68G not being detected
correctly in Maverick and finding that I never get the instance up due
to this.

-- 
ec2 kernel crash invalid opcode 0000 [#1]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651370
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to