> should be specified and added *as a new feature*. Since the current documentation and implementation do not define any behavior for this diverged RAID1 scenario
You could build upon this thread: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/27822 (but leave out the parts that was caused by naming confusion, which is better explained at http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/27820) -- array with conflicting changes is assembled with data corruption/silent loss https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
