I also don't feel it's very serious since for example SSIDs are
generally broadcasted, but this is still an issue, and I rather give the
users a way to not add this information (with a strong recommendation to
still add it):
try:
response = ui.yesno("You can also include scan results and "
"configuration parameters which may greatly help in diagnosing "
"the issue you are seeing. However, it may contain sensitive "
"information. Do you want to include these?")
if response:
report['Gconf'] =
command_output(['gconftool-2','-R','/system/networking'])
report['Keyfiles'] = command_output(['ls
-l','/etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/'])
# nm-tool happens to give a good snapshot of the client's state, so
try to capture this
report['NMTool'] = command_output(['nm-tool'])
except:
pass
I guess the exact wording can be reworked but the idea is there. Marking
In Progress since I should be uploading this shortly.
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (mathieu-tl)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389702
Title:
Apport hook attaches private data, but does not mark bug private
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
