> tags: added: backport-proposed Not agreed - with the changes in r10020 the <check> directive now is simply ignored (tested by referring to a non-existent script), the same way as it was in earlier revisions in osxapp-enabled builds (see comment #2).
IMHO either this directive is removed from the extensions that have it (and remove related the related code), or <check> must be properly fixed. Possibly, since this is a regression in 0.48, the decision to address bug #505107 (win32-only) by cd'ing into the user extension directory (on all platforms) before launching the external process for a script file [1] broke parts of 'Script::check()' [2] in 'src/extension/impementation/script.cpp'. [1] <https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/551433/comments/7> [2] <http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~inkscape.dev/inkscape/trunk/annotate/head:/src/extension/implementation/script.cpp#L377> -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668895 Title: Extensions with <check> tags fail to load -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
